Photo by Getty Images |
“The School Lunch Debate” has been all over the
news since a House subcommittee approved a measure allowing school districts with proven economic hardship to temporarily opt
out of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act nutrition standards passed in 2010. The
new measure would allow schools to sidestep new standards for lower-sodium and
100% whole grains in meals. GOP leaders and the School Nutrition Association,
which represents school food service directors and food suppliers, claim that
the new requirements are unattainable. They are saying that kids aren’t
interested in the healthy options; therefore the schools are losing large
amounts of money due to waste. There is also concern about effectively reducing
the amounts of sodium and other preservatives.
According to NPR, about a month ago, the USDA decided to relax its
guidelines on whole grains by “offering a two-year extension for schools that can 'demonstrate significant challenges in serving whole-grain rich pastas' to continue serving 'traditional enriched pasta products' for up to two more years as the food industry develops better whole-grain pasta products for schools".
Supporters of upholding the Healthy Hunger-Free
Kids Act nutrition standards include the First Lady Michelle Obama, Secretary
of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, the National Education Association, the American
Medical Association, and the American Heart Association.
Education paired with healthy options could be the
answer to healthier students and less food waste. Kids are more likely
to eat fruits and vegetables that they’re familiar with, and toss out those
that they don’t know. Research has shown that kids need to be exposed to a new
food 10-15 times, before they are likely to try and acquire a taste for it. More than 40,000 schools across the U.S. are
currently engaging in farm-to-school activities. Students who are introduced to
new foods in the classroom or school garden are more inclined to try them in
the cafeteria. Education is a powerful and effective preventative measure to
combat diet-related disease.
Paying extra for more nutritious foods in our schools costs much less
than the $14 billion per year spent on treating conditions
such as type-2 diabetes and hypertension in children. One in three children in
the U.S. is currently overweight or obese, and one in three children will
eventually develop diabetes if current trends continue. The answer
shouldn’t be taking away these standards for nutrition, but instead figuring
out ways to help schools achieve them more easily, and with less waste.